823 karma · joined March 5, 2013
[0]: http://www.michaelnielsen.org/ddi/if-correlation-doesnt-impl...
How is this understanding wrong?
Reminds me of a (somewhat tongue-in-cheek) warning against the universal condemnation of suicide that those who have discovered the most compelling arguments for it aren't around to give it a proper defense.
Seems Ars is similarly citing unspecified regulations. It's often the case that regulations that vary by city aren't the most straightforward topic to describe.
Edit: here's an example [0]
[0] http://nbviewer.ipython.org/urls/raw.github.com/JuliaLang/IJ...
[1] http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2013/09/tyler_cowen_on.html
[1] https://www.coursera.org/course/optimization [2] medstats.class.stanford.edu
Attacking a book by its cover?