wesleywt

Are you writing a book with GPS? Are you creating a program with GPS? Are you creating music with GPS?

You need to think to do this, you don't need to with AI.

This is different as you are wholesale giving over your thinking to an AI.

There are a few people out there with AI psychosis that thought they developed a new mathematical theorem.

It takes two years to get up to speed on a job. It seems laying off will cost the company time even if they are saving money.

I always wonder what happens to institutional knowledge in American companies.

If you a tool that replaces your brain then you won't use your brain.

I disagree. People who use too much AI will not learn anything and will not contribute significantly to new developments.

Its not going to be big. There is no obvious use for them unlike email or the Iphone.

Do you really need to reach users on X. It is filter for a specific type of user who don't share the ideals of the EFF. And racists.

The US have been removing leaders for decades.

I love how we in Africa can finally see open corruption in US. You guys can't be high and mighty anymore. You are one of us now.

OP then proceeds not to list the massive fraud.

In this case, saving the children from the toxic misinformation firehose that is social media might save our democracies.

Politicians and empire-builders (Elon) is currently standing in the way of human progress and history.

But to understand the solution from someone else, you would have to apply your mind to understand the problem yourself. Transferring the hard work of thinking to GPT will rob you of the attention you will need to understand the subject matter fully. You will be missing insights that would be applicable to your problem. This is the biggest danger of brain rot.

Without the engagement on the material you are studying you will not have the context to know and therefore focus on the larger problem. Deep immersion in the material allows you to make the connections. With AI spoon feeding you will not have that immersion.

Nobody is competing in this loss making buisiness model.

Why can't you do both? Why does it always have to be either or?

> Electronic music...

Your instrument is the computer and designing sound. You still have to have talent and musical ear to make this music.

Increase coal usage does not mean increase in coal jobs.

He promised his voters no new wars. So your statement is completely wrong.

Trump gave one of the biggest drug dealers ever a pardon as well as the Silk Road guy. Time to sanitise where you get your news, you seem to be eating all the propaganda.

Its an attenuated vaccine, which means it was grown to be weaker then the wildtype by growing it in non-human cells making it more specific to what it was grown in. I have never had chickenpox because i had the vaccine. If had chickenpox as a child you were extremely unlucky because its completely unnecessary.

Humans are pretty good at edge cases.

Nothing, it gets the job done for most people. If you don't like it, make a better tool. Polars is not it.

Maybe you are just bad at pandas.

And yet there are licenses restricting open source use. You should absolutely stop people from using your work if it doesn't align with your values.

I don't see the problem. The market to fix these will eventually emerge.

Because Twitter doesn't pay rent. IDK?

Since Musk took over Twitter one word we could use to describe the process is "disruptive to employees"