wesleywt

Using smart tech to do stupid stuff. We have millions of years of developing our social interactions to know when someone is fake.

We are going to need to know the rate of this happening. And who said it happens?

One of the propaganda strategies Russia uses is to disengage the population from politics. It might a be protection mechanism but you will see many of them say that they are not political. It is interesting to see that this strategy is being used in Western politics too.

You need to develop the intuition in the first place to read box-plots. The author argues that there are other plots where you don't require intuition.

This is exactly why the author says you should stop using Box plots. The plot is easy to misinterpret.

You stop production by showing it's harmfulness.

Bitcoin is at a two-year high.

There are always these strange very dismissive comments that show people on the opposition of climate change have no clue what they are talking about. A one-liner on an internet forum does not disprove climate change. But it intends to muddy the waters and confuse.

Why did the board fire Sam in such a weird way? It shows that they are the wrong people for the job. If they wanted to get rid of him they should have done a better job than alienating everyone at the company.

Yeah, Sam will not turn 40billion into 0 billion

And so America was born.

Just as AI is being overhyped. There seems to be an equally silly trend on HN to undercut its obvious and massive impact.

Yes, GPT is an aid not a programmer. You should still be doing the programming while ChatGPT gives you quick solutions to problems without having to look up Stack Overflow.

Meh. I started coding professionally in the age of AI. My productivity is way higher than it should be. I don't let the AI "write" the code for me. I use it as a companion that I asked question of and suggestions.

It suggests solutions to problems, I add the complexity. So far my code has been both clear and performant. This should not be the case at my level.

This is not bad science. This is science working as intended. Claim followed by verification. I only wish other fields was this good.

What did Nature do wrong in this case. Be specific. And show us where the findings are replicated. That should be easy.

Do not judge for yourself because you are not a dense material scientist. Comments like these pose themselves as intelligent. But intelligent people know that they don't have the expertise to judge everything and do defer to experts in the field. And the experts currently are not able to replicate the findings.

Give the evidence of lab leak. Biological evidence or GTFO

Weird replies. It is obvious the women are dating men over 30.

Should speech targeting violence and discrimination against a minority or "protected" group be allowed on a private platform? It is certainly offending people to call for their extermination.

You are committing massive hasty generalizations.

The Great Firewall of China will become the norm of the internet not the outlier.

We all thought that, because we did not realize at the time how corrupt the abusive the catholic church was.

What she did was real bravery to stand in the face of so much opposition and mockery from us at the time.

It seems for some people they are still from that time.

X-genius throwing a brand in the toilet.

Amazing that now the effects of climate denial by the right, the right-winger in the comment tries to deny it.

The problem is not with science, it is your science illiteracy. You never accept scientific research as "true" until it has been verify and repeated by independent sources. It has become the culture to glorify unexpected and "interesting" results in the media and society at large. But you should find these "interesting" but not necessary believe it to be true.

We do get unbelievable findings such as CRISPR, but beware these will be very few and far between.

Not caring about Excel does not make you stupid.

No. Russians are trying to stop the counter offensive. This move will free up troops to defend Melitopol. Capturing that city effectively blocks land supply route to Crimea.

The link you provided does not discuss retraction rates. Rather its about papers citing retracted papers. I hesitate to make conclusions about your bias at this point.

I don't think you understand any of the words you have just written.