winReInstall

And while the racists and ideologists might use parts of the results to go at each others throats, the truth might even be more weird, turning humanity into a fully self aware grandfather clock, knowing what makes it tick, but unable to stop it.

The fact that Thiel just looked at it, and went full support of totalitarian decline, cause it can not be prevented anyway, gives you an idea on how total of a defeat through knowledge awaits in those DBs.

Of course the decorations are nicer and there are some who are kept around to work as "worser off" examples. But all in all, i guess most would cheer for the fall of this.

Having the have it alls at gunpoint, forced to demonstrate the systems fitness & benefits to the citizens or perish. Which is why there needs to be a elphant graveyard clause in tax-law, that destroys all monopolies via taxation.

Undertaxation is at the root of investment bubbles.

Accumulating economic energy devouring the containment of the system that created it, as at the root of the root of the rootproblem.

We need a dependency manager for discussion topics.

Regarding the natural order of things and stability, i have my very own opinions, i have voiced here, which got me downvote left, right and center.

We would not have google maps, if the map makers guild & caste in old london could have prevented its creation.

Creative destruction beats stability and harmony every time. To enshrine them, is to praise your future decendants slavery and missery.

If you fail them, you get demoted or otherwise restructured.

Of course, this creates a atmosphere of distrust, but some things, like Meritocratic atmosphere, are worth it.

Add to that some forgotten "landfills" of the 70s and you got a interesting underground plowing experience.

Even the degrowth in japan is subsidized with growth in other regions. Real degrowth is instability, is human nature going feral back to religous roots, make many copies, fight the outsiders unbelievers, recover make many copies.

Cycling this drain, decomplexifies societies, loosing the ability to supply bureaucracy, research and experiments.

Lots of countries worldwide partially circle or circled in this loop.

One can not fix a situation, one does not talk and observe objectively. This includes disabilitys of the species as a system constraint.

The ferrocity of american hatred also seems to increase, the more cultural similarity there is. Russia with its redneck culture and iranians with there crazy almost protestant messianic streak, are to much of a mirror to not bark and bite at.

Crypto is to find out about the ten dolar wench as the ultimate key..

Hurting the feelings of the true believers, was the ultimate sin, a sin often committed, but only punished if the sinner did not recant and change his ways, in a brutally public and official way. It was there, that the ____ church revealed what it was really all about all along. Societal control, maybe with good intentions to start with, but in the end, just control for its own sake and to prevent others from archieving the same control.

Not saying, that any social movement could turn into a religion. That would need strange clothing, processions, rituals, codified language and most of all a mythology.

I have no religious preference, im on the side of science and would like to have a civil society, were no member is violated by another. I would very much prefer it, if the combatant religions involved, could leave science alone. Reality is often disappointing.

May the religion with the least suffering caused win and then keep away from the state & power.

We "unchanged" are a exponential curve, bumping against a linear ceiling and this needs to fixed first, to even have the mental tooling and stability to handle grand projects.

Life longs for the exponential. Intelligent life defeats the predation of life by other life (bacteria, virals, predators, etc.) and allows for a exponential curve bumping into the resource ceiling , the line that is the environment. Again and again. Starts the moment you become apex predator actually.

Now darwinian evolution is blind, it just sees the merry go round spiral and adapts sub-groups of the population to it. Stable -> Exceeding Env Limitations -> Unstable -> Society Reassembling. Each of the four groups should in a cycling society be around 25 %. Each yearns for its natural situational habbitat and tries to push towards were it has advantages. Each has deep instincts, to not "waste" resources and step outside the god whorshipped which is a bloody wheel of butchering.

A stable society is basically only possible for brief amounts of time, where the wheel is propped up and technology used to harness a surplus to keep the cyclic society from returning to the "default" of old.

The amount of resources to do this, is enormous and some of the groups involved see this only as a "prolonged" recovery phase pre next conflict/collapse. Handing them the technology necessary to keep the peace, equals handing them apocalyptic weapons for conflict, should the peace break.

So its a trap, unless one learns to implement societal self-control, one will forever hand more dangerous toys to us loop-deformed creatures. Which would make a great explenation for a universal filter, if there ever was one.

Now if we accept, that such variety of "castes" of unreasonable people exists and they do not want to "grow up", then society has to be adjusted for that, i guess. Making capability groups of neuro diverse people.

Such persons would need a representative politically, to speak in there interests. Such a person would need limitations, to limit the damage they could cause.

Reasonable people would have to be protected from this non-blue-blood class, to keep them productive and isolated. Systems need to created, to rile and cool the emotions of the non-logicals to make them steerable.

There should be a science to differentiate the various types of illogical people, based upon the data collected by the big four. And steering unreasonable people should be a science too.

We should call it something cool. Something witty. Leviathancybernetics. Get it. Hobbes, the leviathan, and the art to surgically implant synthetic structures and to turn society into a prothesis god.

Now, lets talk about the negative side effects of knowing so much about society and humans. It turns you into a grandfather clock. All you hear is gears and mechanics, grinding your teeth, while all you observe your own instincts firing from the sub concious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Test-driven_development

This is unsafe C Code by nature, but test driven development on platform can make it "safe".

Now you start with a struct in the union: {inputA, inputB, inputC}

and pad the intermediate struct

{Padding against Overlap, resultB, result C}

and end up with the result struct in the same union.

{outputA, outputB, outputC} .

The trick is to keep track of the state and validate the "purity" via automated tests.

Then you have it all in one L1 Cache Line, pumping through a algo, no dereferences, no huge stack structures, its all there, as long sas the size of input output does not differ wildly.

Remember down there its all just bytes accessed by code. There is no such concept as objects or even variables. All those mental pots to grab things out and put things back in, are artificial constructs needed by us.

The machine down there, can go to work like a line cooking shiva in a trailer. And doing so and having this in view, makes it faster.

PS: Pointers within the struct nullifys the advantages gained here, because every pointer is a memory load and thus "relatively" slow.

No pointers to dereference and wait, just the input, computated, stored back into the same cacheline- to be used for the next part of the hot loop. If the hot-loop is multi staged and the output continously decreases in size, one can even "compress" the data, by packing an array of orgMaxisze/outputSize subunits into the unit.

Maybe he should seek out advice from the dread pirate roberts.

All jokes aside, his idea for daikatana was visionary, but the tech was not there and alot of the design decisions were never tried before.

Whoever made that decision is going to appear in economic textbooks in the DONT Exampels.

I know many are adverse to geo-engineering, but lets say i can predict the winds for the next days, i have a ocean, i have solar and ultrasonic humidifier , wouldnt it be feasable to basically create dense fog - cloud coverage from nothing that is then carried inlands were it rains down near mountain ranges?

You take one of the armies floating solar arrays, add the humidifiers and voila ready is a terra forming experiment never tried before.