536 karma · joined August 24, 2009
I have worked at several places where salespeople have sold a feature without even asking if it was POSSIBLE, much less created/deployed/tested. "We just sold [Feature X], we told them it'd be ready by [date pulled out of thin air]."
Personally I'm skeptical about the registry search functionality being disabled on a wiped machine -- that could easily be a Windows bug. But the other stuff would certainly get my gears turning.
I hadn't seen yesterday's news though so here's a link for anyone else interested: http://lessig.tumblr.com/post/65338904338/wow-or-from-the-wh...
Maybe they'll be great students and just need a break, in which case I might suggest a backpacking trip and/or internship. Or maybe they'll be unmotivated students barely scraping by in which case I might send them into The Real World to earn money towards their education (and find out why an education is important).
I've thought a _lot_ about why I didn't do very well in college (beyond the obvious procrastination), and what might have helped, and filing those thoughts away for my own kids.
The only problem is that kids want to be with their friends, and if their friends aren't taking a year off then it might be hard to convince them to break away from the pack.
How about the possibility that a1a is one of the people who just automatically equates "large volume of code" with "spaghetti"? In my experience there is a fair number of HN users (and devs in general) with this knee-jerk perspective.
In my very humble opinion any reasonable person who takes a few minutes to actually read through this code would never call it spaghetti. _Especially_ considering 1) the feature set of PHP at the time the code was leaked, 2) the immense scale of Facebook even at that time.
And sometimes you find a limitation that can't be overcome and you have to think of a totally new way to do everything. For instance, some API documentation says you can get X but the documentation is outdated and half the data is missing. Back to square one.
Just typing this out is raising my hackles.
wat
"How it works?" - either "How does it work?" or "How it works"
"one profile that gives complete picture"
"a resume doesn't do justice with the capabilities of a Job Seeker"
"Signin to find out more"
"Drop us a mail if you want to know anything about us or have queries or feedback. Please feel free to do so."
Lots more awkward English and random capitalization, sentences that would benefit from a comma, etc. Definitely have a native English speaker edit this.
It could be a good idea though. I like the idea of portfolio sites for graphic designers (like http://carbonmade.com/) and this could be something that would fulfill more of a development bent.
This is just one data point, I know, but I have never (knock on wood) had a hard drive of any kind fail before.
I'd be happy to give details if you don't know (or don't care to see) what I'm talking about. But based on the upvotes to my comment and very similar complaints in other comments to this article, many people agree with me.
I have nothing personal against Android, but let's not just skim over the actual DEVELOPMENT process.
And then the video will be automatically uploaded to the NSA.
In terms of software I agree though, clicking pretty boxes is just a different type of automation. I am co-opting the phrase "artisanal high-touch."
We can't prevent every mistake but we can make sure the same one doesn't happen again.
But since there probably aren't many two-year-olds applying for jobs nowadays the comment is still relevant.
It's madness to classify all use of metaprogramming as abuse. Perhaps you need to pour a glass of wine and learn to savor the source code, and to appreciate the power of modern programming languages.
You can't just assume that everyone CAN pay whatever price is set, and just decides not to because they don't need it enough. In this scenario, the poor people die and the rich stay comfortably unaffected while using the resources others are far more desperate for.
You're making an assumption that everyone can afford the increased prices and it's just about making a rational decision to "pay up" or not.