3,544 karma · joined May 27, 2010
It's not even new. They used to hire people to read stories out loud while workers rolled cigars.
The initial pilot featured a more conniving Penny played by a different actress. The focus group feedback was "Someone keep that mean girl away from those sweet boys".
Think of it as a show for moms / grandmothers / aunts of nerdy men. They want to see them get up so some shenanigans but generally be OK.
It's also a low effort show to watch so you can throw it on in the background while you're doing other things.
Isn't this just a lexical closure? It's common in scripting languages.
I'm sure The Hechinger Report wants to promote the idea that achievement gaps can be closed by simply giving The Hechinger Report more funding.
My 4 cpu virtual desktop was virtualbox emulating a xeon form 2010 w/16gb of RAM. Loaded with monitoring software. Barely useable.
No 3d accelleration. It choked whenever I tried to run high end software like, well, Figma.
Firaxis could certainly send a cease & desist.
On a generic 286 you could swap out the stock ISA VGA video card for a Diamond SpeedStar and the improvement was crazy.
So delayed startups aren't some new issue.
The prosecutors and judges have a lot of leeway with assuming "willfully". Plenty of people have been convicted because a prosecutor wanted to apply pressure / make an example and choose to believe an incorrect date was a willful lie.
A train without breaks isn't really comparable because the planes can break using thrusters. I don't believe that you can engine break on a train to a comparable degree.
https://l.thisworddoesnotexist.com/A3pj
niveescent (of a lens) producing a nive
Also they'll analyze your face and send it to the ad tracking agency.
Who would even own the copyright? The government? The director? Are they public domain? What's the continuity of the copyright?
They probably don't have enough commercial value to fight over.
Now if Ye used a sample of a soundtrack without authorization in a hit song, there's suddenly real money involved. Lawyers and artists would come out of the woodwork and start filing claims.
If he was a wealthy donor to Trump in an identical case he'd be rotting in Rikers with no hope of bail.
Posters here are merely pointing that out.
Wealth buys comfort.
Constitutionally the purpose of bail is to ensure they don't flee and aren't a danger to the community while they await trial. It's not supposed to be a punishment since they haven't been convicted of anything yet.
So wealthy non-violent offenders should have the right to sit in lavish homes with an ankle monitor until they are actually convicted.
That's been standard practice at Twitter for a few years now.