480 karma · joined April 3, 2014
I might have said the same thing, with no malice.
Here's an enterprise perspective:
It's IP address management. it's massive reconfiguration of every node and network endpoint. It's auditing and completely redeploying security measures that are network based. It's training every IT employee on network basics from the ground up.
It's millions upon millions of dollars in man-hours and infrastructure and tooling for something that might have marginal benefit on an internal network. I agree the new world will be better with larger subnets and many of the features of IPv6, but it's more complex.
Fiber-optic and hardware level upgrades touch a lot fewer devices, and are transparent to users and applications.
Good. Look how beneficial Snowden's leaks have been to the cause of civil liberties in the past two years, and because he went Hong Kong and Moscow, many think he MUST be a traitor.
Now imagine if Snowden said "Eh, I wouldn't have done it, but $100,000 was nice."
> Financial compensation shifts the balance to make conscientious disclosure more self-interested.
That's bad; now you've eroded the moral grounds. Even offering legal funds up to $100k would be more ethical than cash payouts.
Substances that are legal but feel too good are prohibited?
And then people tag you in their photos. So Facebook may not strictly know your name, but any agency (of course, never in America!) who backdoors or coerces Facebook could learn everything about you.
Its built-in SSH server is great for moving files to and from my workstation quickly when I need it.
Any context would be appreciated.
>Invective: Denunciatory or abusive expression or discourse
I vehemently disagree and think you insult the paper. It's well written, attempts to describe logical inconsistencies in how we approach our reasons for punishments, and what the legal profession might be able to do to fix it. It turned my brain up, not down, and it makes me think more about logical underpinnings of our justice system. I haven't been spoon-fed, and you also insult readers who might feel they got something honest out of the paper.
I do like the homepage for its simplicity, but no-one would know the significance without digging into the 'community' links. If that doesn't seem like an issue, then nevermind. Just a thought.
edit to explain: I'm at work and can't hop into IRC to chat about it.
Attaching a desktop to an office network rarely has those same mechanisms.
Another example would be to see how long someone could shout obscenities at Putin in front of the Kremlin without getting thrown in the back of a truck. In the US, we have the freedom of press to put out articles like this.
I'm sure the everyday life of a Russian isn't totally miserable, and the US has its major issues, but I can't think of a single civil-rights issue where Russia is a leader.
Or the company is short-sighted, undervalues the skill and experience of onshore jobs and overvalues the $$ they're saving on paper. I bet a buffalo nickel you've never personally seen how offshoring affects a team/department.
They are all analogous. They're all conveniences that use disposable containers. And no-one is calling people a holes for eating Hungry Man.
It's absolutely the exact same thing, and you are incorrect, sir/ma'am.
So instead of "lxc create -t ubuntu -n container1", I'll load a container from an image (just a monolithic template of sorts)?