It's a weapon that has no counter measures. None that I'm aware of, except prohibition.
460 karma · joined December 10, 2011
It's a weapon that has no counter measures. None that I'm aware of, except prohibition.
Well, if that's not sexist..
Now does this really benefit people or not is another question. I think it does. Do you think it does not?
I find it very disheartening. The reasons given by the judge are very fair and convincing. If it's true that he ruled this way because higher court wanted him to acknowledge fair use, judge was not objective.
I wonder if his stance, now or previously, was politically motivated. Let's wish that the judge came to this decision solely on the merits of arguments for/against "fair use". The alternative is depressing to think about.
If the author has not labelled it opensource, should you be cloning it's source code (unless of course, you're the author)?
</strike>
Edit: Sorry, just researched it, you're linking the repo from the author's git account.
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/deterministic-builds-part-o...
Synopsis:
"deterministic builds" -- packages which are byte-for-byte identical no matter who actually builds them, or what hardware they use.
I'm a mysql newbie but am very fascinated with scaling relational databases. It's just seems so challenging and exciting.
If such actions are committed on US soil, this section will not be applicable. So this is about arresting and detaining, indefinitely, someone on foreign land. Land where the US government has no jurisdiction. Am I missing something here?
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.
Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
If I'm not wrong, this is implementation of JSONP to avoid cross-domain AJAX request block, right?
Marketing dept. is most probably the worst offender of online privacy.