2,782 karma · joined September 1, 2011
Why would that cause you to stop posting?
Not google, but not much more work. If you know their name you do not need to know their classification.
The very first words at KFC.com are "Kentucky Fried Chicken"
Doing a text search on the home page says Kentucky shows up two more times.
Paying you for the amount of time you worked is a legal obligation. So really you are talking about can you find an equivalent or better job in the amount of time you would have earned $1,000 if you stayed. Even in the lowest of paying legal jobs in the US, it does not take that long to earn $1,000 relative to securing a job. Not to mention that new job is not guaranteed to fit into your current living situation and other factors that cause the inertia for staying with a current job to be quite large. Seems a bit like a gimmick to me.
I do not believe that raw material procurement and manufacturing account for 99% of current launches or 97% or 90%. Even if it did, I believe there would be significant amount devoted to quality inspections and testing before you could trust a used rocket that not only fired, but impacted the ground to be used again.
Do you have any sources I can read on that? I know reusing some of the hardware will have cost savings, but you are more than an order of magnitude cheaper than I have heard claimed. I would be very surprised that even if all of the hardware was 100% free that there would not be a few hundred thousand in labor costs alone for analysis and launch operations.
That said, I am approaching it the same way I do Lego Mindstorms, Raspberry Pi, and Arduino. However, I do not think Ara will have the education angle those do to reach volume.
I am not sure I see the real value outside of tinkerers. I plan to buy one but I do not expect to actually save money, electronics waste, or have better performance for the dollar.
Now I'm trying to jump to Julia and many of my Python friends are making the exact same arguments (you'll never get the community/libraries/support) that used to made against Python in favor of Matlab.
Anyway, as a long time Matlab user, Julia just feels incredibly 'natural' to me.
I think that is because the link is to the about page, which understandably is about the company. If you remove the /about on the URL you get the stories you are looking for.
I thought the technical/scientific computing market that MATLAB serves was too niche to get critical mass in an open competitor that could surpass it. I saw Octave as always being a second place clone playing catch up. I don't know what it took to get it going but Julia has me very excited and I'm grateful for the team that chose to make it.
I hear this sentiment a lot. Having a higher percentage of cars following safe practices is safer even if those are cars aren't perfect and even if 100% of the cars aren't automated.
Can you tell me the logic (I've seen it many times in posts) that there won't be any safety benefits until all cars are automated (or until there aren't any manual drivers?).
I disagree that the benefit will be that discrete.
Is that really true? I thought Zuckerberg gave more in 2013 to charity then any other person in the United States.
Link: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/02/10/zuckerb...
Thanks
Thank you for the response. I appreciate the insights but I do not agree with the premise that 100 or 1,000 Matlab sessions per server or VM is crucial to the economics of the business.
I know many engineering firms who are perfectly happy and profitable to buy a $2,000+ workstation, $2,000 Matlab license, and X*$Y,000 toolboxes for a single engineer. That engineer might be in meetings all day. They might be on vacation, they might not be working on a task that requires Matlab. Larger firms sometimes get floating licenses that may be 10X or more that cost and still have less 100% software utilization.
I see utilization economies both in software and hardware by licensing out this resource to small and mid-size firms who do not have constant large demand and even large firms who need a surge in computation.
I am an engineer (not CE/CS) who uses Matlab, so I am probably missing something fundamental. However, I am curious why you think server side Matlab requires order of magnitude more efficient solutions to current Matlab. Even as a poor college student I used to SSH into my personal desktop running Matlab and it ran acceptably.
At work I will remote into another system running Matlab without issue. Sure if you are doing heavy plot manipulation it may get a bit laggy depending on the situation, but why would mathematical algorithms need to be rewritten unless you mean graphical?
Also even though the word Matlab is all over the front page, when I went to the about section it said it was powered by Octave. Again, this is not an inherently bad thing. However, I thought this was an online time-sharing license of genuine Matlab. I would pay $9/month for that; I would not pay $9/month for Octave which I have installed on my notebook.
Also you can generally get a student version of Matlab for around $100 so if the only purpose is learning and not "production" Matlab, I do not think it is fair to compare to the $2,000 version.