I never use it, but from what I heard, it performs & scale really well too.
66 karma · joined January 4, 2010
I never use it, but from what I heard, it performs & scale really well too.
I think exactly the opposite. I think apps servers are too important to be left without financial support.
Remember when Zed Shaw abandoned his great work on mongrel? I don't think he'd do the same if he had thousands of paying users, and maybe we'd still use (maintained and improved) mongrel today.
We still use version 4 and benchmark it with unicorn and the likes, and we found no noticeable different on performance, except the fact that it's easier to configure and manage.
rvm install ruby-2.0.0-preview1 --verify-downloads 1can you give us the info about the pricing scheme? how much the passenger enterprise will cost?
Have been a very loyal user of pivotal tracker, I have 11 projects with 12 collaborators. The smallest plan I could choose is $50 per month. That was shocking me a bit, before I knew I can archive my old projects :P
We (well. back then it was just me) began doing this back in 2004.
Fast forward 8 years.
well... uhm... it's still 2010 isn't it?got it running on my linux (with wine)
pretty slick... and yes, as a long time vim user, I think the feature will be very useful. although I don't think it's a macro replacement, macro still better for some use case. vim has visual block selection that can do similar thing, but not as powerful as this multicursor thing.
This is a severe issue. Please fix this.
wow, is she working on some opensource project too?? or just a funny hoax...well, I haven't really thought about it, but, yes, textarea is pretty ugly. and try to make it better (with weird wysiwyg javascript libs) can end up worse. hail _why.