772 karma · joined May 7, 2008
So I'm truly curious what's at work behind this inability or unwillingness to talk to "the masses", as it were.
I didn't go to an ivy league school, but is this generally accepted as true? Is this other people's experience, or is the author's opinion more of an outlier?
Steve's stuff strikes me as a stream-of-consciousness, spellcheck and then post, type of style. Do the 3rd and 4th paragraphs about jocks really contribute anything to his point?
The tech and intellectual social circles here are great, though. Nice people and good conversation.
Have them program something in the interview. Watch them use their chosen text editor as they work through your problem. Have them run their program and watch them iterate through a few code/test/debug cycles. Once it's working, ask them for a minor but logical improvement, and watch their reaction. Dread at having to go back to the code, or gusto in making it better? How fast can they go back and edit their own code?
For whatever job you're hiring for, have them do the job as part of the interview process.
Ex-presidents make a boatload of money, though. Books, speaking engagements, etc. That's a direct result of their power.
If the Boston area wants to get ahead in startups, it's going to need to attract more talent than SF. Sadly, I've seen plenty of MIT grads head to Google and Facebook...and some of those kids are going to be starting the next wave of companies...
Fame, hipness, insider knowledge? All either means to an end or cultural by-products. LA is run on power and money - studio execs are the most powerful, and basically run the entertainment biz, but they generally stay out of the limelight. DC runs on political power, plain and simple. Hipness is a by-product of having a very large concentration of young, single people in one place. You'll find brands of hip in every major city.
Ideas as Cambridge's main "industry" is also somewhat of a dubious distinction. Ideas are cheap. Talented people (i.e., the execution of ideas) is the bottleneck.
It's that the Apple fanboys are boring. It's like hearing the same song, over and over. And it's not a good song, it's like hearing "Who Let the Dogs Out" or something.
If the fanboys could admit that Apple stuff isn't totally perfect, and there actually are better alternatives depending on people's needs, that would lend a lot of credibility to their argument.
I was one of the first people to get an iPod and hop onto the ITMS bandwagon. Now I'm happily jumping off to Amazon's store, simply, because they have a better store.