408 karma · joined February 25, 2022
I make things with computers.
* my blog with text on it: [zdimension.fr](https://zdimension.fr) * my code: [github](https://github.com/zdimension)
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/zdimension_; my proof: https://keybase.io/zdimension_/sigs/YsDs65xqRbedgqtKAxAoazoy9U-04Kju7RV7PwibWyA ]
There is a very nice blog post about someone explaining how they modified their website's CSS to work with some old browser, maybe Netscape, maybe something else, it was well written and fun to follow, but I cannot for the life of me remember where it was from. Maybe someone will read this comment and know what blog post I'm talking about.
> One day, your insurance company may inquire if you have walked enough to be covered. [I think we're past that point.](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/11/technology/carmakers-driv...)
https://gist.github.com/zdimension/63d3aa5f04573267f423520e4...
We're not talking about a grandma losing her wallet with 50 bucks in it and not giving money to the guy that found it and gave her back.
Editing the answers through SO's tools is not the right way to protest (since it's trivial for them to suspend you because you're clearly violating their rules); the GDPR is. Making a GDPR deletion request is quite easy.
> ; REV 2.15 7/13/83 ARR BECAUSE IBM IS FUNDAMENTALY BRAIN DAMAGED, AND
Someone was angry that day. Wonder if any IBM dev ever stumbled upon this when MS and IBM worked together.
Therein lies the rub. Most of the discourse and debate around LLMs and copyright revolve around the central question of what it means to learn.
Virtually everyone agrees that a human learning from reading code doesn't violate copyright (by somehow copying the knowledge into one's brain), because the human brain is some kind of copyright laundering machine, maybe? I don't really know whether there is any argument for that apart that can't be reduced to an appeal to common sense.
On the other hand, a DL algorithm learning from processing tokens of code scraped from public sources such as GitHub doesn't present the same kind of obviousness. My personal belief is that it's also learning and shouldn't be forbidden, but I can't deny the negative consequences of that. We're already seeing a lot of bad things come out of the democratization of GPTs.
The same had happened with the Skyline emulator some time back.
It's not the same scale as Swiss German accents that are sometimes completely unintelligible for German speakers, but I have to admit there have been a few times I've been unable to fully understand someone speaking a thick Swiss French accent
- Windows Messaging (95-98?)
- Outlook Express (XP)
- Windows Mail (Vista)
- Windows Live Mail (7?)
- Outlook Web App (?)
- Windows 8 Mail (Metro)
- Windows 10 Mail (UWP)
- Outlook ("New Outlook")
- another one I missed?
Sure, you can "step through" a neural network but all you'll ever see are arrays of meaningless floats moving around.
Layers having boundaries feels... obvious to me? Like, when I scale a layer, the boundaries are what I'll be scaling. When I crop a layer, I'm cropping the boundaries. If I have a large image and insert a small icon in the middle, should the icon's layer take the full size of the canvas? What exactly is supposed to happen if I insert an image that's larger than the canvas?
A layer in GIMP having boundaries is equivalent, to me, to a shape in Inkscape having a size.
To circumvent this, private non-state-certified schools deliver things called "Bachelor", "MSc", "MBA" or "Mastère" that walk and quack like regular diplomas but since they're using those specific names, they're not actually state-recognized diplomas. Which means that if a company is hiring "people with a Licence" they can reasonably deny someone with a "Bachelor" because even though it's also a 3-year degree, there is no guarantee whatsoever that it's actually worth anything. Anybody can create a company and hand out sheets of paper with "MSc in Psychoceramics" written on it.
This is a big problem for high schoolers who usually don't know the difference and end up paying thousands of euros for private schools that deliver close-to-worthless degrees (not all are worthless, but their worth is mostly correlated to how well-known the school is, whereas if you get a real state-certified degree from a random university anywhere in France it'll be recognized by any company).
This is not the case anymore since now users need to pay to be able to use the mobile app to stream from my server, otherwise they're limited to 5 minutes.
I ended up making a small web UI where they can log in, search for movies and episodes, and download them.
Why? Why do my users have to pay to stream from my server?