Languages with implicit string concatenation using no operator have found it to be a common source of bugs, eg python. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29841560
621 karma · joined January 11, 2018
Languages with implicit string concatenation using no operator have found it to be a common source of bugs, eg python. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29841560
Some long time later (year+) I retried and got in. I attempted to change the security settings, but it wouldn’t let me.
Some long time later again, I’m now locked out again.
This whole thing is ridiculous. I know the password, and have access to the account to which it forwards all emails. It should be obvious that their is no IP address which regularly uses this account, and that they are clearly locking out the account owner for no good reason.
I think to measure efficiency of a written language, you’d have to time how long it takes people to read it (and correctly answer some questions to prove they understood it).
Since I’m moderately familiar with the other language, I really just need the translation for words I don’t understand or mis-hear.
There is such a thing as a real-time translation. I’ve heard it in news broadcasts when a politician speaks a foreign language. It also happens all the time at the UN and other international negotiations. It works well but has downsides such as occasional latency while the translator needs to hear a few more words before they can translate.
The other day I happened to see live content with closed captions, and I thought I would love the option to see subtitles like this, where words are translated precisely when spoken.
If either of those is the case, I think there may be reason to escalate as it does impact your future.
With the above proposal, it seems the foreign key name could be left out in the common case of there being only one fkey between the two tables too.
I’ve never seen Smalltalk before, but I did find the verbose syntax of ObjC had some benefits.
That being said, typical C programmers don’t add all that whitespace, so the “who needs dots” and stuff is a bit misleading.
The notion that every endpoint has a globally unique address, with prefixes coming down from some upstream provider is just fundamentally incompatible with how IPv4 networks are designed today.
More specifically, 他不在這裏 is a phrase that I could imagine being used in official written text in past dynasties. But 佢唔喺呢度 does not.
NAME="Rocky Linux"
VERSION="8.5 (Green Obsidian)"
ID="rocky"
ID_LIKE="rhel centos fedora"
VERSION_ID="8.5"
PLATFORM_ID="platform:el8"
PRETTY_NAME="Rocky Linux 8.5 (Green Obsidian)"
ANSI_COLOR="0;32"
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:rocky:rocky:8.5:GA"
HOME_URL="https://rockylinux.org/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.rockylinux.org/"
ROCKY_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Rocky Linux"
ROCKY_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="8"
On the surface this seems great, but those quotation marks are kind of annoying. Is it possible there's an escape syntax that's used in case the name also includes quotes? eg VERSION="8.5 (Green \"Aqua\" Obsidian)"? Is it also possible you can embed newlines in between the quotes too? Who knows... Thankfully with JSON there is a simple spec. cpu: 0.2
kb_read_s: 0.12
mac_addr: 10:AA:FF:00:55:66If they apply this algorithm to the source IP and find that the optimal route to the source is a different interface than it was received on, that’d potentially be a red flag. But if the optimal route to the source is the same as the optimal route to the destination, that’d be a huge red flag.