Golang fits in nicely in such cases. If I want the JVM, I rather build a clojure'ified uberjar.
117 karma · joined August 22, 2012
Golang fits in nicely in such cases. If I want the JVM, I rather build a clojure'ified uberjar.
With golang it's just one static binary that is scp'ed across the nodes. This easy of deployment isn't talked about much.
We were also able to go further and put a RESTFUL API on top of these tools using negroni and gorillamux.
http://codegangsta.io/blog/2014/05/19/my-thoughts-on-martini...
Has anyone used both? What are the pros and cons?
Everyone out there seem to start out with a CI traffic light using Arduino. This is no exception :).
http://blog.codegangsta.io/blog/2014/05/19/my-thoughts-on-ma...
git archive HEAD --format=zip > release_v1.zip
And then ship the code.I picked up org-mode again after trying a few online tools (including Google Docs and Trello), only this time spending an entire day reading the docs and a few blog posts on customisation before putting it into use.
The day ended with a "(add-hook 'after-init-hook '(lambda () (org-agenda-list 1)))" at the end of my .emacs file.
It was totally worth it. I am more organised now and as someone who gets distracted easily and may have a slight case of Adult ADHD, it has had a positive effect in my life. Just add Dropbox to the mix and it becomes all the more awesome. As you said, I love it how it just 'fits' in with Emacs when writing code.
Learning org-mode is not a wasted effort. There is just so many things that you can do with it once you know what you want.
It would be neat if we can use the Jobtastic task as a decorator, similar to the celery.task decorator. That way I won't have a bunch of JobtasticTask subclasses, that only differ in the way calculate_result is implemented.
If needed I can set the variables needed by passing kwargs to the decorators instead. It will definitely be easier on the eyes.