In a previous HN discussion, I believe it was the commentary on the changed ownership of The Economist - several commenters said that they think The Economist usually carries biased and badly nuanced pieces when it comes to territories outside of the West.

I'm not holding this against anyone, but as far as I can see, this piece is nuanced and well balanced. I can not find any particular bias towards any one entity. But if anyone does see any, please bring it forward, as I'm genuinely interested.