Hacker News Reader

Global warming is obvious from the data. End of story. The AGW debate is about the extent to which this very real warming is caused by human activity. At best, all those effectoids you prattle off are only interesting as confounds for the models that are used to tease out causes for the warming. The overall warming itself is indisputable.

View on HN

Interesting comment having positively nothing to do with my comment. That you fail to understand that speaks volumes. Of course, you're the one who conflates 135 years with 14 billion years, so not unexpected.

If you observe a pattern that what you think is your point is not getting across to your readers, it could well be that your readers are dense. It could also be that what you're writing is unintelligible.

The pattern is that it is utterly impossible to discuss any nuance of AGW, the data, or its meaning, without zealots such as yourself acting as strongly as you can to make sure everyone knows how much of a Believer you are.

AGW is reality. The disciples of AGW are profoundly intolerable, however.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com