Hacker News Reader

Comment by tericho | Hacker News Reader

Seeing a lot of comments about how Angular had no migration plan. Migration was discussed at length at ng-conf back in March, including a large portion of the keynote(s). They made it very clear a smooth and simple migration was top priority.

Part of migration talk in keynote: https://youtu.be/QHulaj5ZxbI?t=12m43s

Full playlist: https://youtu.be/QHulaj5ZxbI?list=PLOETEcp3DkCoNnlhE-7fovYvq...

View on HN

Yes, it is a considerable frustration. At the beginning, the Angular team said something along the lines of "we are working on a Angular 2, after we figure out how it should work then we will consider migration and come up with a plan". For some reason this was widely interpreted as "there will be no migration plan".

I agree that there were a lot of misunderstanding going around but it has caused some problems. For new projects you have to choose a platform/framework. If you choose Angular 1 you might have to learn it and release a version of your app with it before Angular 2 is released or just before the migration path is clear. And it is till hard to estimate the migration cost/time. Or you could start with Angular 2 which you knew was not ready. It was and is also unclear exactly when Angular 2 will be "ready" making it a less interesting choice if you have/had a hard date when your app should be released.

Fair point, but worth noting that compared to the migration plan discussed at ng-conf in March, this is now an improved plan. For example, from the post just published:

Wasn't the original upgrade plan to use the new Component Router?

The upgrade plan that we announced at ng-conf 2015 was based on upgrading a whole view at a time and having the Component Router handle communication between the two versions of Angular.

The feedback we received was that while yes, this was incremental, it wasn't incremental enough. We went back and redesigned for the plan as described above.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com