'Kerr added, "Having the defendant enter in his passcode would minimize the Fifth Amendment implications of the compelled compliance, as it would not involve disclosing the potentially incriminating evidence of the passcode itself."'

You gotta hand it to these lawyers, they certainly know how to talk bullshit. Actually, entering the passcode into the device could potentially then leak it from the device's memory so this isn't a valid way to circumvent the Fifth Amendment--which is clearly what this asshole wants. It's akin to being asked to write it down on a piece of paper instead of saying it aloud, something that's clearly unconstitutional. Unfortunately, idiots like Kerr will continue to go around spewing bullshit trying to undermine our constitution for their own gains.