This gives me some disquiet. I realise that this is what advertisers want - high quality ads that can't be blocked, but I think its harmful. In general, I avoid going to sites that have a policy of doing this.
This gives me some disquiet. I realise that this is what advertisers want - high quality ads that can't be blocked, but I think its harmful. In general, I avoid going to sites that have a policy of doing this.
It reminds me of Ogilvy's book on advertising [1]; Ogilvy's experience taught him that informative ads that explained the advantages of the product were most successful with customers. Sponsored content is exactly that, and the opposite might be something like clickbait [2].
Sponsored articles are accessed voluntarily by the customer clicking on them and reading them, and returning to the site; they are unobstrusive being mostly made of text and of (relatively) higher editorial quality, with good photography and so on. I wonder if they are the future of advertising.
On the topic of being unable to filter advertorial content from, well, content, I don't think it's as clear cut as ads vs not-ads, since every writer has their own set of opinions and presents their world view only (with few exceptions). A necessary life skill is critical thinking, learning to dissect an argument, examine its assumptions and data, and come to an independent conclusion as to the point it is making.
[1] core principles are summarized in his "house ad": http://smartonlinesuccess.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/dav...
[2] famously (NSFW): http://www.lazygamer.net/general-news/a-history-of-evony-ads...
The ads are not only happening in articles, it is also happening on Vine, where companies sponsor videos of popular users:
[1] http://www.dataprivacymonitor.com/social-media/ftc-clarifies...
>§4. An advertisement shall be designed, in a way that it will be clearly recognisable as an advertisement of whatever form and whatever media in which it is placed."
If you receive a review-copy you should state that, and if you get a discount you should also write that. I am not sure about if the company already pays for advertisement, but they want to stop hidden advertisements.
Some bloggers have received hefty fines for violating this, but it seems like the readers are more used to the concept now.
On all Danish produced TV production created after 01/07-2013, product placement is banned. This includes films as well, since they can be broadcasted.
But foreign produced films and series are not included in this, so we can still be able to enjoy James Bond on TV.
The trade association suggested to show a notice in the program, or afterwards, when they used product placement, but it was never put in law, and was it was banned instead.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/nov/26/vloggers-must-t...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30203816
https://www.asa.org.uk/News-resources/Media-Centre/2014/Maki...
You can link to that how you like. I can't, I need to make sure there's a difference between promoted content and my real content.
"#32 Yes people read long copy [...] (This page contains 1909 words and you are reading it.)[...]"
Found a text transcript here, mentions late '60s publication: http://www.infomarketingblog.com/ogilvy-mather-direct-ad-4-h...
For example, he mentions in his books that people enjoy having something to read whilst waiting for a bus. I personally love long wordy ads in the metro or on the bus as they help me pass time between stops. Even when the content is utter crap.
He sold Rolls-Royce by going and talking to their engineers - at the plant! - and figuring out what made the cars special. Then he wrote a snappy line that captured the gist of it, and some text underneath for those interested enough to keep reading. The ad [1] is now a classic in the industry.
Interestingly, his position was that he would never do political advertising. Key to the success of his ads were telling the "truth" about the advantages of your product (sure, embellish it, but do not lie as you get found out) and he was disgusted by the fact all political campaigns were entirely made of lies and often attacks.
[1] http://bordiniuc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1ss01.jpg
So he said, and maybe even believes, yet the magazine will remain nameless, and from looking at the website even a knowledgeable person wasn't able to tell it's all sponsored content.
> It could be a piece on Tesla
Wait, since when Tesla does native ads? Do they do ads at all?