Let me guess: "I could care less about it".
Did I summarize it well?
You know when you see Linus piss on security so easily, you start to wonder - maybe that joke about allowing the NSA backdoor in the kernel was actually true?
Did I summarize it well?
You know when you see Linus piss on security so easily, you start to wonder - maybe that joke about allowing the NSA backdoor in the kernel was actually true?
Did you mean "couldn't care less"?
> Did I summarize it well?
no
> You know when you see Linus piss on security so easily, you start to wonder - maybe that joke about allowing the NSA backdoor in the kernel was actually true?
Are you referring to the article you didn't read here?
Actual takeaway:
> "The only real solution to security is to admit that bugs happen," Torvalds said, "and then mitigate them by having multiple layers, so if you have a hole in one component, the next layer will catch the issue."
He cares.
David Mitchell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7O0MFkmpw
That's so obviously not what he's saying, though, but rather that it's never something you can "win" and that you just have to be rigorous in how you mitigate it.
I literally wish I could downvote you a million times