edit: I apologize for the ad hominem nature of this comment. I just get frustrated when people attack major contributers to open source projects. We need to keep in mind how important these projects are and how thankless contribution can be.
Martin has done a lot of work on HTTP/2 and WebRTC. If somebody wants a different message in the HTTP/2 handshake that doesn't evoke immaturity, then that person can contribute sufficient to gain stature in the community and then change that message. Criticizing Martin's avatar is just dragging us into deeper waters for nothing.
I thought hackers were for meritocracy, and not nitpicking silly things like avatars.
Say there's a summit on internet governance and someone is making a point about this statement against PRISM and wants link to his commit message. Say that someone is part of the US government and the audience is middle eastern business men. Who is taking away from the meritocracy now?
This guy is actually a Principal Engineer at Mozilla, working on WebRTC.
If you're attempting to slyly suggest something, everyone would be much better off if you'd just come out and say it. Please don't waste people's time with innuendo.
Why would you not expect programmers with strong political leanings? What kind of world do you live in where top researchers all share moderate views and modes of expressing those views?