I like the libertarian/wild west mindset of the internet. It doesn't however lend itself to integrated public transport systems - of which, private hire taxis are a part.
Plus, it is replacing local businesses with a multinational that will probably send its profits to an island (like lots of other technology companies), rather than contributing to local economies. I think it is the next Groupon though, so at some point it may pop.
Each driver did his best to cut costs and raise revenue like: break traffic laws, not pay for insurance, not service their cars, not clean their cars, etc.
And since hailing a cab doesn't really give a lot of consumer choice besides what cabbie happens to be driving by at the moment, "competition" is loosely applied at best.
Pre-regulation, this would mean chances were fair that you'd enter a cab driven by a verbally abusive asshole who can't drive well, blows smoke into your face at a 15 second interval, doesn't know the city, and has basically no regard for human life or decency.
At least according to Time magazine in 1976: Modern Living: Call Me a Taxi, You Yellow Cab!
"a verbally abusive asshole who can't drive well, blows smoke into your face at a 15 second interval, doesn't know the city, and has basically no regard for human life or decency" sounds a lot more like taxi drivers than Uber drivers (with the exception of "doesn't know the city", fortunately we have other mobile apps for that too!)
http://fortune.com/2015/05/22/uber-lyft-disabled/
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/uber-disability/
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/05/21/uber-disabi...
http://time.com/3895021/why-the-disabled-are-suing-uber-and-...