Guess I'm only getting exposed to the Chinese 1%, so thanks for this article.
Guess I'm only getting exposed to the Chinese 1%, so thanks for this article.
That's probably part of it. Of course, to extrapolate large trends such as 'China's Millennials are happy to own nothing' based on 5000 or so people without looking into their ability to own things would be just as silly an sweeping generalization to make.
I originally typed $1500-2000... I see a lot of Thom Browne stuff here, and that means $350 for a button up, $1000 for shoes. But it's probably a minority still, and you can't tell how much shoes/boots cost without knowing the brand (though I've seen some Rick Owens sneakers).
Edit: Saw you mentioned winter. Yeah that drives my number up. My $1000 was based on fall/spring type of stuff.
I don’t think the struggles of normal people, or the fact that people have to save money, are understood by someone like him.
EDIT: I don’t usually read through comment histories, but here it’s to provide a context, not to judge the person, and these earlier comments from him, a few weeks ago, harden my belief: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10288459 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10124135 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10049439 although this comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9195212 goes in the other direction.
Still, you can get a good outfit for below 200€. Watch not included, as everyone has a smart phone anyway.
I bought my winter jacket, from the 2014 collection, in April 2015. Factory sale at Elkline.
Jeans are normal price, boots, same – bought in march 2015 – again saving a lot.
You are just wasting money by not taking advantage of seasonal sales.
I'm sure I've never worn a $1000 outfit in my life, and that includes a made-to-measure three-piece suit.
"Honestly, [$1000] is cheap as fuck. Have you met a regular person? Regular people go shopping every week for different shit, its unbelievable. I have friends that buy bags for $2k each, hats for $200, etc. Just because I literally only bought a few sweaters, a jacket, and boots a decade ago does not in any way make me inefficient. I am also not burning money by buying $50 sweaters." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10673865
Only stuff I've bought in the past half decade is maybe like a few t shirts and socks/underwear. Everything else lasts.
Absolutely no clue what you wear for $100 in the Winter. Summer I can understand. I guess it's the boots/jackets that really change the price as 3 piece summer outfits I agree should be below 100.
You need to wait for special deals.
A 400$ jacked can go for as low as 90$ if the season is over and you buy a winter jacket of last years collection in april.
Glasses are cheaper to buy 10$ a year insurance that replace at any physical damage than to buy expensive – 190$ once, plus 10$ a year. (but I won’t count glasses for outfit, as that’s stupid – glasses are a disability tool, and I say that as someone who is short sighted).
Sweater for 50 is far overpriced, look more in the direction of 10. Pants are normal, though. I’d even say a good jeans is more like 80$.
Those prices already are cheap. That's a $40/year jacket. I mean I guess I could hunt and wait for deals but I don't have the brainpower to track yet another "thing" you know? I only spent a few hundred on clothing in the past decade with the majority of my main purchases being at the start of the decade. Shaving off $50 here and there from that would do virtually nothing for me. If you shop frequently then by all means hunt for deals but I wear the exact same thing every single day (this is where I makeup the money I lost on expensive items by not getting them on sale).
Please don't pretend like the prices that you are posting are in any way normal. Fit, quality, and style are greatly sacrificed for price. I can't even remember the last time I saw a $10 t-shirt that wasn't on sale or clearance.
And, even when dressing with style, you are just burning money.
Where do you live? There's no way you live in the modern world if you think $10/sweater is a regular price for something because that's absolutely insane. Do you only wear 90's crewnecks? I can see those being $10 at the local goodwill. If you do then why are you trying so extremely hard to find the lowest prices possible? Are you living in poverty?
Buy during sale at H&M, C&A, Vero Moda, etc. Normal clothes.
Normal people don’t have money to buy bags for $2k. Normal people are struggling to pay their bills while being a single mom with kids. Normal people can be lucky if they can afford clothes from ALDI, and don’t have to go to the Red Cross. That’s the reality for most of the former middle class.
My family luckily doesn’t have to live like that, but you are seriously not "normal person". You’re rich. Your friends are rich.
When your friends buy bags that are over twice the monthly salary of some people, bags that cost more than a vacation for 4 people in another country, then you are rich.
Some people, living on uncommonly-high tech salaries in the bay area and similar locations, might indeed spend $1K on a change of clothes. I imagine some other highly-educated professionals in expensive cities might do as well. There is nothing wrong or unreasonable with that, per se. But "$1000 outfit is standard" is a statement that applies to very few people, and implying that it should be the norm is absurd under present world economics.
For the record, in my experience, most people I meet in tech and in the bay area, still won't often get close to wearing $1k. Those who do is often only when you include things like prescription glasses, leather jackets and wearable gadgets ;)