I can't see where Boudreaux's comments - themselves more polemic than analysis - expose any "dishonesty". I mean, one of his posts pulls out the old libertarian canard of "every potentially harmful product will be effectively countered by competitors taking the equal and opposite opportunity to sell good honest consumer-friendly protection" by speculating that a market solution to smells designed to induce customers to over-eat could be rival entrepreneurs selling a nose-attachment[1]! And as far as I can tell, he's actually not trying to parody his own argument. If that's one of the best objections he can raise to an example in Akerlof and Shiller's book it must be remarkably good by the standards of popular economics texts.

[1]Perhaps the only reason America doesn't have a penchant for nose attachments and no obesity problem is because the market isn't free enough!