It is like saying if we gave each homeless person money, we'd fix homelessness.
Now just replace homelessness with psychological issues and money with psychologist.
No, the underlying reasons I gave are factual.
http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21582535-costly-...
You are not acting in good faith.
In no way did it address the issue.
Stop poisoning the discussion with unrelated sources that in no way support your points.
People that read your comment might be under the impression that the article had any relevance. It didn't in any way.
Pointing that your sources in no way support your views is not trolling. You're just using ad hominem again in order to not be challenged.
It won't work. Give it up.