Hacker News Reader

Comment by nostrademons | Hacker News Reader

It reminds me a bit of the Ben Horowitz essay "Why I did not go to jail"

http://www.bhorowitz.com/why_i_did_not_go_to_jail

In general, laws are not something you want to fuck around with as a startup. You can break proprieties, you can do things that will piss certain people off (you're almost guaranteed to piss off your competitors if you're doing anything interesting, for example), and typical business ethics assumes that everybody is looking out for their own interests and can advocate for themselves. But when someone has explicitly said where the boundaries are - and particularly if that "someone" is a government - it's good to respect those.

View on HN

because I remembered reading it, there's a wee bit more to the story than Ben shares. It took a while to find it since Bloomberg reorganized their site [1] but here you go [2].

tl;dr: what Sharlene really went to jail for was more than shifting grant dates around (some by more than 60 days, which is more than a month last time I checked.) She appears to have changed grant and exercise dates both to increase income and to shift exercise income to long term capital gains, and then mislead auditors about these practices. Specifically, she want to jail for listing a false exercise date on her income tax return.

The point is, according to the reporter, what she went to jail for was more clear-cut than Ben is claiming.

[1] http://go.bloomberg.com/market-now/2014/02/12/dont-worry-ben...

[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20140309175428/http://go.bloombe...

Ben doesn't share that backstory, but it's irrelevant to his point. He is suggesting that he might have gone to jail by association with her and having done something illegal at his own company. Hence his statement:

"Since we had the same head of finance, we almost certainly would have been investigated.... The whole thing was a case of the old saying: “When the paddy wagon pulls up to the house of ill repute, it doesn’t matter what you are doing. Everybody goes to jail.” Once the SEC decided that most technology company stock option procedures were not as desired, the jail sentences were handed out arbitrarily."

So even if she did much worse things at her old company, the SEC could have decided that he broke the law too (even if in a less major way), and should go to jail too.

No.

She did not go to jail for option grant backdating. She paid a fine for option grant backdating.

If you were honest with your auditors and did not lie to the SEC, you generally had at most an enforcement action and income restatement.

https://www.sec.gov/spotlight/optionsbackdating.htm

Reply on news.ycombinator.com