I don't know the details of the algorithm and perhaps it doesn't give more explicit weight to his games. But I wouldn't be surprised if after some iterations the algorithm decided to give more implicit weight to the games of the world leaders.
I don't know the details of the algorithm and perhaps it doesn't give more explicit weight to his games. But I wouldn't be surprised if after some iterations the algorithm decided to give more implicit weight to the games of the world leaders.
However, this only gets you so far, and the training set is fairly small compared to what you want to really train both the policy and value networks well. So then they had it play millions of games against different versions of itself, training both a new policy network and the value network based on that.
It's unlikely that Lee Sedol's games made much if any impact on AlphaGo's training. It was bootstrapped off of high-level amateur, and some casual pro, play, but from then on it just trained against itself.
So even if AlphaGo isn't explicitly designed to play against his style, it's implicitly trained in it.
But it's pretty subtle and I'm guessing that the volume of high-level tournaments overwhelms any effect, as the AlphaGo team said.