...that doesn't even fall into the category of "propaganda".
Seems like propaganda to me. That is the sound byte I associate with this whole mess. It was repeated quite often.
Usually by the enemies of the banks, though. It's at best propaganda for the other side, if at all.
Well, the banks got what they wanted. A big fat payout and subsidies from the tax payers. We hedged their risks. They don't need any propaganda. Now before the decision was made...
And didn't you say that is not "propaganda"? What is your definition of propaganda? Maybe we can have a rational discussion if you declare what you mean by propaganda.