Would it be different if it was a widower? Or is that acceptable because men can deliver with things like that whereas women can barely cope with the grief of losing a man let alone all the legal stuff that is probably way over their head.
"Would it be different if it was a widower?"
I would still have a problem with continuing a lawsuit because of something a man's wife said.
"Or is that acceptable because men can deliver with things like that whereas women can barely cope with the grief of losing a man let alone all the legal stuff that is probably way over their head."
sigh... Its lines like this that make me think the divide is too great and our better angels are long gone. Sadly, I'm reluctant to give up my seat on buses or hold the door open these days because I don't know if I'll offend. Its so much easier to just ignore others and tune it all out and make like I'm oblivious.
Personally I hold doors and offer seats. I find that if someone makes an issue of it most/all people think they are the idiot and not me.
Mr. Kyle is not here to defend himself. He might be entitled to sue, but if it is supposed to clear his name, it won't. It shows he's a person of low character.
Would you let a lie about your character and stating you wanted more SEALs killed stand?
I would fight the lie (if it is a lie), but I would never continue to sue when the person who has offended me is dead. It just makes you a bully. Your reputation is the important thing and not the money. Frankly, going after the money just shows its was probably true. The appeals course reversed the judgement, we'll see how he continues it.