I wonder... If there were really "countless internal YouTube communications" endorsing infringement, wouldn't this case be over already? As in Summary Judgement over? Doesn't the very fact that this case is still being litigated indicate the hyperbole of this press release? I don't understand why Viacom is saying anything at all. Maybe they are trying to reassure their investors. In any event, I doubt we'll ever know what is really being uncovered in discovery.