Go on...?
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/08/28/060828fa_fact2?c...
Note that this has been strongly disputed by certain parties mentioned in the article that do not come off that well, but the New Yorker stands by the reporting and has not issued corrections.
This is both frightening and disappointing. I can hardly imagine how much advancement in the field is being held back by this attitude.