Meta:

Perhaps a hint could be added on HN's submission page about adding the year of publication in parentheses for older articles? That seems to be the custom.

I was about to ask why an article from 16 years ago is being posted to the front page when there surely has been a newer and more academic analysis of the material available at some point within that decade and a half. When I say academic, I mean it in the sense of a "just the facts, ma'am" approach instead of one with a commentary attached, regardless of the alignment of the commentary.

Yes the reference to "the shooting at Columbine High last spring" confused me, then I noticed the date.

I came here to see whether there was an explanation of why it was being reposted. Maybe there are some predictions in it that have come true?

I think it's interesting context to the continued rise of feminism today.

Flagged and dead, though. Doesn't fit the narrative.