> use of a communication facility to facilitate the commission of a felony
How exactly is this an additional crime to said felony? How does using a telephone make the crime more heinous? This seems like one of those laws that's designed to be guaranteed to add more charges, similar to such gems as "non-violently resisting arrest".
Also, when the charges are all for the same crime, the sentences are almost always concurrent, which means they run at the same time. It doesn't actually increase the length of the prison sentence.
Sure. How bad of a crime? Thirty days in jail? A week? A year? Is that in line with practice?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mancer-l-barrington-iii/mandat...?
another
http://legaliq.com/Case/United_States_V_Quentin_C_Adams
and another
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/182/...
Those were literally the first 3 I tried.