How can they write that as a plus when it is the same screen size and resolution as the previous model, and the competition as a better display overall?
http://www.kimovil.com/en/compare/apple-iphone-6-plus,apple-...
Why not mention the lack of SD card slot or removable battery? <-- EDIT : Thank you all for your openness of mind!
If I make a display with twice the pixels, ten times the size, and give it 16-bit dithering color, will you call it obviously better based on more pixels + larger?
Or are there factors other than dimensions and pixel count that affect how we evaluate display technology?
...because there's more to a display than those two qualities? It's 25% brighter if I'm remembering right and now supports the DCI-P3 color space.
>> "Why not mention the lack of SD card slot or removable battery?"
Because these are things that have never featured on an iPhone, probably never will, and everybody knows that. Lack or removable battery is also something the main competition is switching to for better water resistance (S7 does not have a removable battery).
A removable battery is quite useful and the norm for many home devices.
I found the Android user.
Seriously why is this so important to some people? I went for the 64 GB iPhone 6 Plus last time my upgrade was ready and I've never had it more than 40% full. The hell are you people doing with your phones where you need 512 gigs of storage?
Because only a tiny but vocal minority cares about it.
iCloud is taking care of photos, there are large GB models and most people needing more battery life are just buying those $10 lipstick USB chargers.
these two are just bs benchmarks. like floppy disks and dvd drives.
edit: the display. well, i'd go so far as to say that nobody in the industry has as good as displays as apple. and nobody needs higher resolutions on that physical space when they already can't see pixels anymore.
https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/iPhone+6+Battery+Replacement/29...