The post has a misleading headline.
It doesn't expose anything and mostly just whines about Uber's valuation.
If anything it underscores the challenges of disruption and the fluid nature of the on-demand services.
It may even be a case for opportunity in the space because this seems to indicate that people want it, but no one has gotten it right, yet.
I don't know if this is a conclusion or an indictment, "It’s increasingly obvious that Uber’s $69 billion valuation makes sense only in a world where it’s the only player in town—with workers who are either squeezed or replaced with robots." Either way, it's silly.