> What makes it a 'communist' regime if it doesn't fit the communist ideology?
It called itself that way, that's why I used the term, as I explained.
> That must be why there are no jobless, homeless, poor people in America.
The reason why there are such people in the U.S. is not corporations per se, but rather lack of social system (which also comes from your fellow citizens). In Europe, we have corporations too and yet we have less problems like this.
I am not saying corporations are not a problem, but in this case, they are not the primary cause.
> So how do your children eat if you don't have a job?
Unlike communist party, corporation cannot prevent you to have a job. If you have skills which are in demand, you can still work for smaller business or on your own. That's the main difference.
(I don't actually find capitalism strictly more ethically valid, but that's entirely different discussion.)
> So you're telling working for a corporation isn't the same as being in prison? Wow, much insight.
The OP compared it as such. I was just explaining why it isn't.