Hacker News Reader

No kidding:

"Unfortunately for Google, those two numbers can be readily found via a website known as Google dot com:"

...followed by two screenshots of searchs for the numbers, both of which only show results with snippets like "according to a transcript of court proceedings from Oracle Corp.'s copyright lawsuit against Google.", "....said in court while disclosing figures Google says shouldn't have been made public", and "Thanks to a lawyer, we know now that Google has made..."

Right? Something can be a so-called "open secret" but where it is brought up and how it is intended to be used is what is at question here.

And arguing for the "heat of argument," is a weird position to take, but I'm sure no lawyer and definitely no Oracle lawyer.

That article was simply hard to read. I kept asking if this was a story or a news article.

Especially with that animated gif above the fold. I had to scroll to a point where the animation was completely hidden to be able to read comfortably.