https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300001 (Men)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300002 (Women)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300025 (Men, 20+)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300026 (Women, 20+)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300001 (Men)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300002 (Women)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300025 (Men, 20+)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300026 (Women, 20+)
Back in the 50s, only ~30% of women used to work. Since 1950 it now went up by 27 points. (31% -> 58%). In the meantime men employment went down of 17 points (88% -> 71%).
So overall for the population, we went to 59.5% ((88+31)/2) of the population working (Assuming as many men as women) to 64.5%((71+58)/2) of the population working. Where is the 'quiet catastrophe'?
Compared to 1950, 5% more of the current population is now working. Shouldn't the author feel happy about the gain of "meaning, self-esteem and masculinity" of those 5%?
Here’s a comparison of men (in black) vs. women (in blue). Very interesting.
https://www.numer.al/us_bls_data/figures/labor-force-partici...