Hacker News Reader

Comment by matt4077 | Hacker News Reader

If the article is a good preview of the case, it does seem to be bullshit... The mechanism by which this discrimination supposedly happen was the stack ranking feedback system.

Now I believe stack ranking is stupid and somewhat cruel. But I don't see how it allows more discrimination than other grading systems. The lawsuit also doesn't claim intent and it'd be quite a stretch to assign liability to the CEO for hard-to-prove unintentional side effect.

View on HN

Now, once the lawsuit is filed, he gets to do discovery. And if some exec at Yahoo has ever said something over email to the effect of aggressively promoting women, and, given the current set of beliefs in the Valley, it is hard to believe nothing would turn up, the guy might have struck gold here.

Because performance reviews are highly subjective to begin with, you can easily hide discrimination behind the guise of stack ranking. It's easy to prove liability, she is CEO she has all this performance data at her fingertips.

If the lawsuit is to be believed, it's a stack ranking system with some unusual twists - most notably, the part where higher ranking managers can arbitrarily change ranking scores of anyone under them, bypassing their direct managers. He gives a specific example where scores of several people were decreased from above with no explanation, and seemingly no clear basis other than gender.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com