Nothing more annoying than a company that starts to overstep boundaries.. Stay out of my personal decisions.
Nothing more annoying than a company that starts to overstep boundaries.. Stay out of my personal decisions.
Unless they show that Uber is routing the cars over speedbumps at high speed or something, there's no reason to think that there'll be excessive wear beyond the simple distance covered.
They can walk-back their unlimited mileage warranty, if they want. But not selectively for arbitrary usages.
Indeed, the more restrictions Tesla adds, the more enforceable it is:
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2010/09/the-end-of-used-m...
It won't sound evil. They will just tell the politicians that in order to invest huge sums of money they need guarantees, that the uncertainty of not binding their customers hinders job creation and investment, etc. Nothing is new in that playbook, since from their point of view it's actually not even wrong. It's not like they have to come up with some outrageous lies. Today it's Tesla, but that process has been going on for a long time. It's just too good: Control over a stable income stream instead of the ups and downs of the free market. It also appeals to people working in those firms, so again not actually clearly "evil".
It also appeals to a lot of people in our allegedly "uncertain and dangerous times" that there is ever more "order" and control. They actually have a point: The more complex out systems become, which includes the state, the more dangerous failure and the harder a recovery. Are our systems becoming more unstable? If so the trend explains itself, because that calls for more certainty and control - since changing the system itself seems to be no option because nobody knows how and what to change it to, or at least there is no trace of a consensus. So, more order and control it is.
(Which your linked article makes clear.)
My bet is that this is more because of legal reasons than business model reasons (though of course Tesla wants a piece of that pie)