Exactly my thoughts. Also, despite the message being carved in stone, after only 70 years it has deteriorated already. "There is XXX danger to visitors". Irony?
The article states that the stone does indeed say "There is no danger to visitors" so I'd assume it's vandalism.
Looks like vandalism.
I'm guessing it originally said "no danger". That gouge looks like the right size for 2 letters.
Yes, I had the same though that there was vandalism taking away the "no" so that it intentionally says it is dangerous
Sabotage, deliberate. The word "no" was removed to make a point.
Which makes you wonder who else will sabotage it in the years to come. Maybe the word "danger" is next to go?
My thoughts were that the sign was left modified as they cannot conclusively say there is NO danger.