I think that Software Engineers should be held to the same standards as other kinds of engineers (and yes, I am aware I am implying Software Engineers are Engineers). The industry just hasn't caught up yet.
I think that Software Engineers should be held to the same standards as other kinds of engineers (and yes, I am aware I am implying Software Engineers are Engineers). The industry just hasn't caught up yet.
The other major blocker is that the Professional Engineer licensure process requires "four years of progressive engineering experience under a PE" (see https://www.nspe.org/resources/licensure/what-pe). There being few, if any, software PEs, there is something of a chicken-and-egg problem.
Agreed, this is a big issue.
Also, it requires that the school have a specific accreditation that is unusual for Computer Science. My school has it but it didn't have it until 3 years after I graduated because it was so new. Although I had to take all the same courses as the eventually accredited version. (my year was the first year to do so but it takes a few years to get the accreditation)
So I'm not sure if I'm even eligible to take it because of that.
Not just accreditation (many schools have that), it needs a specific type that is for engineering.
Either way, as someone pointed out. It is a process. It won't happen overnight.
Based on that page I linked, the SW Engineering PE has the lowest passing rate and an average passing rate of repeat test takers of any of the exams. I presume because most schools and careers do not prepare people properly for this exam.