Cuddy wrote that she was "concerned about the tenor" of the discussion regarding power poses and other disputed studies, worrying that such criticism could have a "chilling effect on science." Cuddy’s not the only one....Fiske, a professor of psychology at Princeton, referred to scientists who search for errors in published studies as "destructo-critics" engaged in "methodological terrorism."
Yikes. So when a study is seriously flawed, the bad guy is the one who uncovered it? I'm more concerned that peer reviewers aren't searching hard enough for errors.