False. USB 1.
False. USB 1.
Apple rarely goes proprietary with their ports. The original 30-pin iPod port. Lightning. ADB in the mists of time.
All of which were I believe better than what was available.
They are better, but we also have a situation where the only port on an Apple device is proprietary with the latest iPhone.
If we put the iPhone 6S model aside (because the -S models generally do not adopt a significant change in features), the only model released since USB-C is the iPhone 7.
Given the short lifecycle of phones, adopting lightning rather than postponing until USB-C has given several generations of phones with a superior connection.
Should the iPhone 7 have adopted USB-C instead of lightning? Perhaps, but USB-C support isn't exactly widespread (and it might in fact be Apple which ends up pushing USB-C support to the point of widespread adoption).
Is the lightning connection superior to USB-C?
Well, it's size is smaller: 6.7mm x 1.5mm (vs 8.4mm x 2.6mm for USB-C); a 42% reduction in height, and a 20% reduction in width.
For devices like mobile phones, I can see how the size of connector can be more important than bandwidth or compatibility. I'd like lightning to be a standard, but it's definitely an improvement over micro-USB, and in terms of size, it's better than USB-C.
Of course, the one huge flaw is that now their phones and laptops use different connectors.