Benchmarks are great! These are however a crime against all respectable benchmarks ever.
By aggregating all the results together, we have no idea how to tell whether it's just some games that the processor doesn't do well with, & we have no idea how to find out which types of games that may be. Your willful disregard for all the points I'm making are an insult to the inquiry that any decent benchmarkers would do- we have to know what games do ok and what games fail to begin to make a pattern.
If only old, ancient single core games suffer, & suffer badly, so be it. If all games are a little bit under par, ok. But we need something other than the terrible aggregated synthetic mess of a "benchmark" that is presented here which gives us no idea where on the spectrum this processor lies. This benchmark is a sham and bullshit & could not work harder to prevent any kind of meaningful conclusion from being drawn.