I would recommend Cx to all React contractors. Cx runs on top of React and solves many React/Redux pain points. It also offers comprehensive widget library and charts.
Disclaimer: I'm the author.
Disclaimer: I'm the author.
You're right, many free projects offer the same or even greater functionality, however, you're not taking into consideration time you spend to put everything together. If your client is paying you hourly, Cx is an investment which pays off quickly. We're contractors too and this was one of the reasons behind Cx.
I understand that commercial licenses are not very popular these days, but for a small company like ours, I don't see any other model allowing us to concentrate on support and the product in the long term.
I also appreciate that writing a good licence is hard, but yours does seem to be particularly awkward. For example, if we're developing a project for a client, our terms typically state that they will have a certain minimum standard of licence for any third party code we use, so they know they're in the clear deploying or distributing whatever we build for them. Your terms giving only a revocable licence would immediately disqualify your library, as would any other hedging about being able to use it indefinitely once it was paid for.
The bottom line is that our clients don't want to get bogged down with the terms of third party contracts or licence agreements and whether they could undermine the whole project, so anything with the slightest hint of risk is immediately more trouble than it's worth in this sort of area.
But your licence scheme seems to favour devs who only work for one company a contractor would get a new one for every project.
I don't understand whether this license is reasonable or not (setting aside price) - which is a problem. Most developers will not hire a lawyer to parse the 7 pages of legalese.