That your opponents won't notice this happening to the first currency. You're trying to starve the system with billions of dollars of transactions!
You're discussing taking on the coins in order, but you only get one element of surprise.
> Maybe in your haste to cry fallacy you just forgot to mention an actual Bitcoin side chain that would be competitive with Ethereum or Montero in that situation?
No, I did but you didn't notice. The off-network exchanges. They're already what 90% of coin holders think of bitcoin as, so they wouldn't notice or care that big transactions between exchanges took a long time to settle. Like I don't care where or when my physical bank trucks the paper money.
Also, the $1B / month you're injecting would fund a lot of work on the ecosystem.
> Burden of proof is on you at this point.
No, it doesn't swap back and forth every post. When I discount your vampire-bats plan by pointing out the sun, I don't suddenly have to prove the existence of the sun.