I seethe in anger every time something I'm looking into ends in a IEEE or other journal who militantly police arXiv preprints.
The day we bury the last for-profit closed access journal will be a momentous day in the history of science.
I seethe in anger every time something I'm looking into ends in a IEEE or other journal who militantly police arXiv preprints.
The day we bury the last for-profit closed access journal will be a momentous day in the history of science.
But in fact, the publishing companies receive money from both the researcher and the reader. They charge the researcher up to $1,500 to publish the article, and then they extract money from the readers by charging a subscription fee to their institution (which constitute a large portion of the library budget).
Not even the editors or reviewers receive any financial compensation -- they often volunteer their time for the peer-review process.
The entire procedure and profit extraction is a disgrace.
Germany are (have?) Pulled access, some other south american countries have also with local academics saying that everyone uses sci-hub for everything anyway.
Could be a good target for an activist hedge fund investor to short the stock and attack the company.