It's my hope that these new findings didn't result from a sneaky plot by a mining conglomerate to increase demand for copper.
It's my hope that these new findings didn't result from a sneaky plot by a mining conglomerate to increase demand for copper.
Your conspiracy has a problem of many magnitudes.
Imagine every stainless steel surface in every hospital being replaced with copper or bronze (which seems likely over time). Imagine that this subsequently becomes fashionable in private homes for the same reason.
I have a yacht and its anti-fouling paint has a high percentage of copper, for the same reason that copper seems effective in a hospital operating theater (it's pretty toxic). Imagine that a copper mine operator wants more public acceptance for copper as an everyday material. Both these recent developments produce that outcome, even given the fact that dietary copper is in reality a microscopic volume of the material. For the latter, the effect is more psychological than practical.
I emphasize that I'm not taking this hidden-agenda idea seriously, it's just something to think about.
In one of the tables the cost for bronze (more durable than pure copper but having similar antiseptic properties) is listed as 19.5 versus 10.9 for stainless steel, same units. So bronze costs almost twice as much as stainless, not a ruinous increase given its antiseptic properties.
One could seek an alloy form that would balance a material's antiseptic property versus cost, a project that hasn't yet begun.