I'm not sure where the author's coming from, but the IDE seems fine to me. I use IntelliJ at work, so that's what I'm used to. Maybe there's stuff that an actual Android developer would have issues with -- more advanced features, but I thought that the tool was leaps and bounds better than the Eclipse extension that used to be supported.
What? How can you declare this after spending at most a few hours in the environment?
And you get all this with Android Studio, too. Let's not forget Kotlin, which might not even exist without JetBrains' involvement in Android Studio.
BTW I sometimes fell back to XCode even when I was a heavy AppCode user, e.g. when the battery was running low. Switching is mostly seamless, because both watch the filesystem and seldomly complain about clashes. Perhaps one could use some lightweight Java editor alongside Android Studio, too?
You seem wholly unqualified to make this type of judgement
But I will say that if someone is accustomed to A, and they are forced to use B for a short period, it is incredibly common for those users to bitch and gripe about how terrible B is simply due to lack of acclimation. The fact that they develop for Android infrequently makes their observations less valid to me, not more.
Yes, Android Studio requires a lot of memory, but welcome to 2017 where entry computers have 8GB. Beyond that, their complaints are whiny "this is strange and unfamiliar and threatening to me" bullshit.
There are real complaints here.